
On Saturday 17 the 38th Art Basel had come to an end. Galleries from New York to Tokyo over Hamburg and San Francisco presented their artists in three stupendous halls, hoping that wealthy clients (either affluent by having earnt the money themselves or affluent by having married into money) buy a piece of art from one of the uncountable modern artists, photographers, painters, ... In the end it's rather a question of money than a question of taste wether to buy or not. Walking trough the rambling floors of hall 2.0 and 2.1 reminded of a vanity fair of art collectors. Rich patrons mainly from America, France and Asia walking around the art pieces, talking about the art pieces and showing up their dresses, suits and most stylish handbags and sunglasses. Women in their middle ages strutting with their rich husbands and their children. Gallerists who are bored because their's no potential buyer for Takashi Murakami, surfing through the internet or writing instant messages like the Japanese ones, in between writing mails, chatting with well informed connoisseur of art about Thomas Struths' Museo del Prado to ascertain maybe that most of the people visiting the Art Basel 38 sometimes look at the paintings of Picasso, Max Beckmann and others the same way. So is it the fact that taking a photo of people in a museum, extend it to a maximum and finally hang it up in a gallery or at an art fair declares the photo as art?! Maybe. One reason e.g. a photo becomes art is by taking a photo of a normal scene and then put it into another context people are willing to think about. Another important fact is to create the ideal basic conditions, like where to hang up the piece of art, what the title is called, in what the art piece shall hang (a frame,...). If the art piece has something "strange" or "deranging" - good! Maybe it's just a lint (normally connotated with dust) that becomes a part of the piece - and part of art!
Did you say to yourself "If THIS shall be art, than I can do this too!" or something like it by looking at the Atomimage2007 of Katharina Grosse in hall 1.0 - oversized painted ballons in various colors? Maybe. But the differnce between people asking themselves kind of these questions and artists like Grosse is : The artists did it! In the end, The Art Basel 38 was good art: Even though most of the showed artists were pretty famous, well-known and high-classed - Who does NOT know Gilbert and George, Kandinsky and other dead and still alive artits of ther modern??? The hall 1.0 with it's Art Unlimited was therefore qute refreshing - discussions about art, music and installations inviting people to active participation. But all the art from Ai Weiwei to Cyprien Gaillard over Trisha Donell can't repaint the fact that art and business are like twins, the one can't exist without the other (including the fact that I got blisters on my foots at the end of the day :))
P.S.: As usual, all photos taken by me :)